Reflections on Type: A 10-day Enneagram Workshop with Dr. Claudio Naranjo
Original Publication: Reflections on Type: A workshop with Dr. Claudio Naranjo by Katherine Chernick was published in the Enneagram Monthly in 1996.

Introductory Note:
Studying the Enneagram was a turning point in my life, beginning with the first Enneagram training manual I received from a fellow attendee at a course on symbols in 1985. During the course on symbols, the instructor asked if anyone knew of the modern-day application of the Enneagram. The woman to my left had... She had attended Kathy Speeth's Enneagram training while working on her Ph.D. at the Institute of Transpersonal Psychology (ITP) in Menlo Park, California. I immediately asked her about it, and she kindly spent every break and lunch teaching me the Enneagram and gifted me her manual.

I have been fascinated with typologies since I was seven years old. As an adult, I mastered quite a few personality typologies to better interview, hire, train, manage, and develop personalities that differed from my own. The Enneagram was unique in that it was the one system that could hold every other system. I became fascinated with the transformational aspects of the Enneagram and understanding the nature of the forces that make us who we are at the level of unconscious motivations. Everything I do, I tend to do intensely, so I immediately began to avidly study the Enneagram from every perspective I could find, interviewing friends, family, and clients and their friends and families, as well as attending courses wherever I could find.

1994 Research:
In 1994, I began the first of 24 qualitative research studies examining the "internal experience of type" regarding the Enneagram types and subtypes. In the summer of 1994, after the first Enneagram Conference at Stanford University, I expanded my research by adding hundreds of participants from all of the diverse Enneagram schools of thought who attended the conference.

This 1994 research confirmed that people have a “core” Enneagram Type but that we also have a Tritype® (a dominant type in each center of intelligence), This research led to the discovery of the 27 Tritype® Archetypes (3Types, TriCenter, and Trigram) and their hierarchical Stacking Pattern (Order, Proportions, and Identifications). In addition, it confirmed we have a “core” Instinctual Subtype but that we also have all three subtypes used in a hierarchical Stacking Pattern (Order, Proportions, and Identifications), and there are Countertypes for all 9 Enneagram Types, also used in a hierarchical Stacking Pattern (Order, Proportions, and Identifications). Most noteworthy was the finding that the Instinctual Stacking Pattern was in charge of the Type and the Tritype® Stacking. This is because the more primitive aspects of the instinctual Subtypes trigger the defense system. An unmet instinctual need, the primitive level of personality, whether real or imagined, produces a red alert, signaling a threat to survival to the defense system. The instinctual stacking then triggers the ego level of the “core” type and Tritype® Stacking.

I then completed three Enneagram Certification programs: Oral Tradition (Narrative) with Helen Palmer and David Daniels, and the Enneagram Institute with Don Richard Riso and Russ Hudson in 1995, followed by the Enneagram Breakthrough Method with Kathy Hurley and Ted Dobson. in 1996. attended the 10-day SAT Institute Intensive with Claudio Naranjo in 1996 and the 5-day Reunion Intensive with Oscar Ichazo in 2005. To support the continued advancement of the Enneagram and the distinct schools of Enneathought, I was on the planning committee for the First IEA Enneagram Conference in Chicago in 1996 and was a member of the IEA board of directors from 1996-1998.

While each approach was different, it still testified to the seemingly inexhaustible way of evaluating human nature. Each filled a different section of the broad mosaic that is the Enneagram. I am eternally grateful for the wisdom of Gurdjieff, Ichazo, Naranjo, my teachers, and those before them who have been the custodians of this knowledge.

Writing this Article:
When Enneagram Monthly invited me to write this article, I felt I had much to share about this extraordinary intensive. I aimed to include both the relatively unknown and obscure aspects of the Enneagram. At the beginning of the Intensive, Claudio mentioned that he hadn’t taught the Enneagram in the U.S. for nearly 24 years, that there was significant misinformation about the types, and that he had never taught the complete 27 Subtypes to his SAT groups in 1971-72. He requested that I bring my research on the Subtypes, which I did. After reading my book "Enneagram Instinctual Subtypes," he expressed delight in my findings, validated my research, and chose to teach the 27 Subtype Archetypes while allowing me to incorporate my nuanced insights as he discussed the Subtypes. This initiated an extraordinary exploration of Naranjo’s Instinctual Subtypes involving my findings and the experiences of the 78 participants, leading to an even deeper understanding of the material.

Writing about the experience turned out to be another matter because Claudio's and my speaking and writing styles are so different. I tend to string adjectives together for emphasis, while he prefers concise words or phrases that convey the message.

Therefore, this article is, in effect, my "translation" of Claudio's teachings, and so any awkward phraseology should be attributed to me. Similarly, although this is my impression of what Claudio was saying, the information was so rich that it may well have resonated differently with others. Stated concisely, I walked away with a more expanded, integrated view of type. Now for the string of adjectives. ;)

Reflections on Type: A workshop with Dr. Claudio Naranjo by Katherine Chernick was published in the Enneagram Monthly in 1996.

Claudio's 10-day Enneagram Intensive:
In April of 1994, Claudio Naranjo held a 10-day workshop in Boulder, Colorado, his first in-depth teaching of the Enneagram in this country in more than 23 years. I was fortunate enough to be able to attend and found that Claudio's unique style of teaching as an INTP, contributed as much to the learning experience as did the content. With wisdom, kindness, skill, and patience, Claudio freely gave of himself, indulging us and politely answering questions in a responsive yet neutral manner, creating an environment in which I thrived as an ENTP.

I had many, many questions about everything that was unknown about the Enneagram since he had not been teaching in the US for almost 24 years. Ichazo was also not available except at his school, Arica® Institute. Claudio answered them all through the intensive and thereafter.

Teaching Style:
Claudio placed little emphasis on the structure of the workshop, instead placing more significance on transmitting information toward a greater goal that emerged daily. Interspersing nuances and descriptors with theories, the week unfolded.

Rather than having an agenda and covering the types in an A-to-Z manner, Claudio's approach was distinctive and focused on relativity. Instead of a methodical approach, he employed an intriguing conversational style, similar to the way we actually speak, spontaneously and with free association. Just as you might begin to predict what he would talk about next, he would suddenly journey into another deeper realm of the Enneagram before ultimately returning to his original path.

On any subject, he would weave in nuances, theories, information, comparisons, character sketches, and a touch of humor. Thread by thread, random thoughts were strung together, and the tapestry of type began to take form. Often serious, sometimes thoughtful, clearly curious, and always knowledgeable, he elaborated on the types. As a teacher, storyteller, and sage, he interwove more obvious, overt pathology with the hidden simplistic view of the wounded child.

I found myself paying rapt attention to each pearl of wisdom, stringing them together one by one. This was especially meaningful to me, having discovered so many wonderful nuances of the types during my various research studies.

Beginning with a history of the Enneagram, Claudio acknowledged the works of Gurdjieff, Ichazo, Freud, Jung, Sheldon, Pearls, Horney, and others, combining their theories with Eastern philosophies and spiritual practices. Claudio explored many schools of thought, uniting Western psychology with Eastern traditions, resulting in a highly integrated view of type.

Claudio's Approach:
First, he discussed the different passions and fixations and then examined the types, ultimately breaking the types down into the three instinctual subtypes.

His approach was remarkably effective in that we got the essence of the fixation prior to assigning it a number. The benefit of this approach was that when we were examining the actual passion, it was unfiltered by our previous conceptions of what that type was supposedly like. It contributed to an overall "layered" effect that I think opened up the organized mind.

Claudio started with interesting general observations of the passions, and then proceeded to discuss each passion in depth, making memorable statements along the way. For example, he defined the sloth of the 9 as a "lack of voltage," no motivation, and out of energy, stating that you cannot repress anger without repressing everything. He referred to it as "laziness of awareness", which he called being "functionally dumb," not a dumb person, but choosing to function with dispassion; and the laziness was of awareness or consciousness because awareness is too painful, and distraction is preferred (e.g., "don't rock the boat; let's not create a problem by seeing how it really is"). He described it as a defense of "not knowing."

In contrast, the passion of the 2 is pride and "ego flattery" or "egocentric generosity," and represents a "love trauma." The 2 has a sense of "false abundance" and is in full denial of emptiness, filled instead with false love, often "promising more than they deliver, and delivering more than they promise." As Claudio noted, there is not much room for the self when filled with pride.

In describing the passions, Claudio did not try to make them appear equal, yet suggested that all the passions equally keep us from our essence. Possibly, the mood in a society or a historical moment may determine whether or not a particular passion is considered good or bad. If so, this explained his theory that many 3s believe they are 8s, for in business, some 8-like traits are valued and esteemed. Thus, some 3s, recognizing that this is how they need to be seen in order to be successful, have identified themselves as 8s; but their underlying motive is that of a 3, which is to fulfill the role.

Claudio taught that the wings are ever-present and that the Enneagram point is the convergence of the wings. He introduced theories that the passion is the "yearning" that is visible by age five and is a response to the situation, an emotional pattern, whereas the fixation is the "way of being," a life philosophy and an abstraction that is fully in place by age seven.

Claudio's words were carefully measured, extremely concise, and effective. There was nothing forced or artificially balanced, with no sense of "apology" with respect to any particular type, thus permitting one to view the types clearly.

For example, when discussing the passion of fear, he described it as a lack of courage or as too much fear, in effect a fear of fear, adding that perhaps all of us can be cowards, but not all of us are afraid of fear. He submitted that the passion arises from the attempt to avoid experiencing fear or projecting fear, and trying to ignore having fear, resulting in suspicion and no faith in self. So a defiant, counterphobic attitude arises from the need to defend and be guarded, to be inhibited.

This explained the way the counterphobic 6 differs from the 8; the 6 is inhibited, whereas the 8 is not. For example, the counterphobic 6 can be bold and do heroic things ("military man") but still have phantoms or phobias.

He further stated that 6s feel "swallowed by others." This choice of words creates a clear visual picture that rings with validity. Being "swallowed by others" might be interpreted as a fundamental fear of what could happen to them, a terrible fantasy, imagined exaggerated danger. There is a tendency to submit, and the counterphobic fights that tendency, while the phobic runs away. Anything new would be threatening, terrible. Therefore, the 6 is slow and "holds back and does not display" and instead becomes a "proof" junky.

Choosing words that create pictures is another impression of Claudio's teaching style. Furthermore, he does not seem to use the same approach for each type, and instead uses the words that serve the type. As an illustration, Claudio sees the 7 as passive-aggressive with humor, diplomacy, and conscious manipulation, believing that "having my way is love." When he talked about the aspect of rationalization of the 7s, he referred to them as having a lubricated or "slippery" quality. As "utopians," the 7 likes and offers gentleness. With a philosophy of life to "live and let live," the 7 has a lighthearted way of getting around the super-ego. Yet, "behind every good boy there is a spiteful brat" (Fritz Perls), and what is not observable is the 7's non-connection and hidden paranoia.

Passions:
Claudio viewed the chief feature as the "core of character," a "distorting of reality, an illusion, a trap, a cognitive defect, a ruling passion, the crazy idea about things," and sees the passions as the basic motivations. He described that all the passions are various deficiency motivations, a wanting, a form of light passing through different filters creating different colors. The capital sins, as well, are thought to be deviations in psychic energy, creating destructive effects in life and spiritual obstacles.

Fixations:
He portrayed the fixations as ways of being hung up on our own assumptions of reality, the fixation is the particular assumption of reality we have, and it crystallizes in our consciousness, "lack of appreciation of life as it is," and is slightly different for each of us. He believed that we contend with all nine fixations and that it is just a matter of which one we overuse.

Claudio saw the 5 as feeling a sense of impoverishment, having very limited resources and energy, and with non-expression of feeling (dry, desert-like depression). They tend to amputate reality, repressing whatever they feel is bad about themselves, and because of such repression, their unexpressed anger goes inward. Thus, they are easily depleted and look inward so keenly that solicitations from the outer world are experienced as interference, i.e., "you are in the way of my listening to myself."

Both the 5 and 1 seem to repress anger. However, by comparison, the passion for the 1 is anger and is motivated by the need for "perfect values," perfectionism, and, more importantly, a lack of acceptance for imperfection.

So unlike the 5, the 1 has inverted anger "reaction formation," a moral superiority, kindly intentions that cover anger, a rejection of one's own experience in favor of what should be (a willed, positive regard not supported by true loving feelings), therefore at odds with reality.

Working with further distinctions, he explained that the reason the 1 and 3 have a surface resemblance is that the 3 has the "right image" (e.g., the perfect person), whereas the 1 has the "perfect values." He cited Dick Tracy, Barbie, and Star Trek's Mr. Spock as examples of the 3.

He saw the 3 as having no feelings, like HAL, the computer in the movie 2001. The 3 modulates the expression of feeling; they look like they feel "nice" when they do not feel "nice" at all. The deception is the logical and clear simulation of feeling. Think of HAL, who, in an effort to be efficient, killed off his own people on his space ship then kept the information from himself and searched for the killer.

Relativity, Comparing, and Contrasting:
Claudio taught his transmission through relativity, which he accomplished by comparing opposites by juxtaposition rather than by cataloging. Everything is compared and contrasted and has a point of reference, i.e., the Sexual 4 is arrogant and demanding, whereas the Self-Preservation 4 is oneish and tenacious; or the 8 is spending energy, whereas the 5 is saving energy.

Another aspect of comparison is the relationship of opposition in the Enneagram. For example, the 1 and 5 are on the "anal axis," the 2 and 7 are on the "oral receptive axis," and the 4 and 8 are on the "oral aggressive axis." Some of the similarities between types included those that shared common issues. In addition, the 1 and 5 have issues with control, the 2 and 7 share issues with connection, and the 4 and 8 share intensity.

Claudio introduced a multitude of theories and intriguing ways of slicing the "Enneagram pie." Of the triads, he said the 8-9-1 was the triad dealing with ignorance or unconsciousness, the 2-3-4 with craving or desire, and the 5-6-7 with issues of hate or aversion. In addition, the 8-9-1 was the neutral aspect of the Enneagram, the 2-3-4 was the extroverted perspective of the Enneagram, and the 5-6-7 was the introverted triad. He saw the right side of the Enneagram as primarily feminine and social, the left side as primarily masculine and antisocial, and so on. He gave us many, many different Enneagrams, so to speak. These perspectives suggested different internal views he had synthesized, resulting in how he saw the types.

With regard to the polarity of temperament, he viewed the 7 and 4, as well as the 5 and 2, in sharp contrast to one another. The 7 is seen as the happy character, whereas the 4 is seen as the sad character; and the 5 is seen as having cool aloofness, whereas the 2 is seen as having warmth and intimacy.

Another aspect of temperament was mood. He talked about mood (elation versus depression), and that the 2-3-4's are quick and gregarious, and the 5-6-7's slow and timid. He discerned that within the triad, there is a contrast in mood. For example, the 2 and 7 have the high moods, and the 4 and 5 have the low moods, in their respective triads. An example of the high mood in the "extroverted triad" is the 2, which we know to be up, quick, gregarious, and outgoing. Similarly, an example of the low mood in the "introverted triad" is the 5, which we know can be depressed, slow, withholding, and withdrawn, and so on.

As mentioned, the 4 and 5, at the pit of the Enneagram, are hypersensitive and see the abyss, and are difficult and fussy versions of the low moods from the two different triads. In contrast, 8-9-1, the third triad at the top of the Enneagram, is described as ignorant, neutral, insensitive, and unconscious, and as "defensive extroversion with an avoidance of inwardness." This insensitivity is perhaps a reflection of self-forgetting. As an example, the 8 has "solution mastery," tends to be a cynic, exploitive, and focuses on the simple nuts and bolts of life, and is viewed as tough, rebellious, vindictive, insensitive, and thick. Most important, the 8 is insensitive to subtlety, and needs strong stimuli, e.g., "loud music, heavy spices, and intensity to feel alive."

Instinctual Subtypes
Claudio decided to add his view of the 27 instinctual subtypes. He had not intended to teach the subtypes.

The backstory is that Claudio had seen my Enneastyle research work that was published in the Enneagram Monthly and found it to be noteworthy.

Jack Labanaskauas, from the Enneagram Monthly, when speaking with Claudio about another matter, mentioned to Claudio that the woman who conducted the qualitative research and article of Enneastyle: The 9 Languages of the Enneagram Types, that he liked would be attending Claudio's course in Boulder, Colorado. He had previously told Jack, " I have not explored the self-image of the types, so was impressed with Katherine Chernick's qualitative research and keenly interested in what she discovered."

Jack mentioned that I had also conducted qualitative research on the subtypes. Would Claudio read it and tell him if my findings were accurate? Claudio said he would, so Jack told me to bring a copy to give to him. I gave my book to Claudio on the first day of the intensive, thinking I might get his feedback later.

To my surprise, he read it the first evening. When I asked him what he would correct, he said, "Nothing at all." It was at this time that he said, "I validate your research that validated my theory of instinctual Subtypes." He further said, " He did not think he knew enough about the 27 subtypes to teach them but was inspired when my research filled in some areas of interest for him, so he decided to make time to teach them. ."

As a result, everyone attending wanted to buy a copy of my book, so we went to Kinkos and had them make 80 spiral-bound copies. Then, we all began a deep dive into the Instinctual Subtypes, Claudio's major contribution to the Enneagram.

We discussed my findings during the inten “He was pleased that my research determined that all teachings of the subtypes were from his seminal work since he had not been given attribution for the subtypes." It is true that people assumed they came from Ichazo. So, you may come across early handouts that say Ichazo, but that is an error. Even the training manual I mentioned at the beginning of this article gave attribution to Ichazo. It is important to note that Ichazo and Arica do not teach about Subtypes.

He asked me, " Would you add my view of the 27 archetypes to your book?" I was surprised but said that I would be happy to. I asked why he did not want to write his own book on the subtypes. He said, " I need to contemplate your notions of the subtypes further, so I am not ready yet."

He finally wrote his own book on the subtypes with students in 2012. It is in Spanish. You can use google translate if you have a copy, but I should mention that each word he uses in English is very precise, so the right translation from Spanish to English is important as well. ;)

He taught that the instinctual type is one of three sub-personalities that is the "auxiliary passion." He suggested that outwardly the instinctual subtype can look positive, like a talent, or something of which one should be overly proud, but inwardly is a reflection of unhappiness with a price to be paid, e.g., "the oyster is not too interested in the price of the pearls."

With regard to the instinctual subtypes, one intriguing insight into type 4 was the introduction of a rare type of sexual 4 that can be "counter-envious" with 8-like tendencies, which Claudio described as often appearing "more 8 than an 8." This sexual 4 is in denial of envy, is self-confident, claims position, and knows his or her own worth ("I deserve it"). Moreover, this 4 can be cannibalistic, overstep boundaries, and diminish others to make the self bigger and to prove one right. Examples given were Hitler and Pacino in Scent of a Woman.

This raised my question to him about "counter types" for each of the Enneagram points. I discovered in my study with the instincts that each type had one stereotype and two countertypes, and that one of the countertypes appeared to be very atypical, like his example of the sexual 4.

Childhood Histories:
As a psychiatrist, Claudio was interested in studying what his participants would say about their type. Having submitted our childhood histories to Claudio prior to the workshop, we were also able to delve into a variety of self-diagnostic psychological exercises and broke into groups by type, where impressive similarities and patterns emerged when the data was shared. We put our results into graphs, clearly demonstrating a similar pattern of attention, which was even more visible when we shared the results on panels.

Through observing the demeanor of a person, something can be perceived that is deep and profound. The trick is to be able to recognize it when it manifests.

Visual Characteristics of Type:
This brings to mind a Holographic picture or kaleidoscope, which, when shifted, reveals images not previously seen. Similarly, you need to know what you are looking for when determining the type.

As to knowing what to look for, perhaps it is, in reality, everything synthesized that with subtlety reveals a crystallized sense of type, like the varying perceptions realized from the Holographic picture or the kaleidoscope. Therefore, when an individual displays an "eagle eye," upright posture, with a carriage that is very proper and held tight, and with a finger that tends to point out all the "shoulds" and "should nots," we might all agree that this is a 1. Admittedly, this approach may not always work, for there is invariably the element of individuality. However, this concept clearly represents a way of seeing that, if understood, can be extremely powerful.

Of course, there remains an ongoing question, which subtleties do you decide are defining and, thus, indicative of type? It is unlikely that one answer will apply to everyone, and so an approach for one type will not necessarily work for another. What was most noteworthy about this workshop, its style and approach, was how it emphasized the subtle nuances about all the types, the messages that surface on their own, and that you can recognize if you are receptive to them. The ability to do this must be what Claudio calls his "nose" or "seeing through the game of the other.

Claudio's focus was on recognizing the pathology and the hidden passion of the types. He reinforced that the study of typing must go beyond written descriptions and that of much more importance is the ability to recognize type intuitively. He emphasized creating more of an environment for seeing the subtleties, trusting the gut, and letting subtlety be the dominant factor.

I found the ten-day intensive to be evocative. I came away with a more expanded sense of type and yet a narrower set of criteria, "Ennea-types," Claudio's personality assessment according to the Enneagram. The nuances have continued to surface for me. I have discovered that there is an underlying subtlety that cannot be conveyed through using one particular word or descriptor. Perhaps we rely too much on descriptors since it is tempting to want to classify. I found that it leads most away from their actual type. More importantly, I believe there is something inherently revealing in a person's posture, something detectable in a person's microexpressions, tone, speech, lexicon use, manner, carriage, energy, and the distinctive way people respond to situations. I found all of this to be important as I had already mastered the study of behaviors, body language, and micro-expressions.

In conclusion, Claudio explained that the logic of the system suggests that whereas the truth is liberating, a felt insight must also come into play; and by working on the virtues with attention to practice, transformation can occur. Finally, he suggested that working with a trusted group that will call you on your fixation is one of the most effective ways to challenge your compulsive behavior and will support the growth process.

Reflections on Type: A workshop with Dr. Claudio Naranjo by Katherine Chernick was published in the Enneagram Monthly in 1996.

More on Tritype® here:
Katherine created a test that has been programmed to pick up particular patterns that the types use.
Take the Test here: https://enneagramtritypetest.com
General Information: www.katherinefauvre.com/tritype
YouTube: Katherine Fauvre | Creator of Tritype®